How toxic is your favorite drug?

By -
Here's an interesting little chart from American Scientist via Sullivan:


Now look at which drugs are available freely (nutmeg), pretty much available freely (alcohol), perscription only (codeine), and banned outright (marijuana). Conclusion: whatever scheme is used to classify recreational drugs, it seems to have little to do with toxicity. I've said it many times but it bears repeating: The "War on Drugs" is stupid, immoral, and a colossal waste of resources.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Of course, given that the measurement in use here is effective dose to lethal dose, this is presuming that you are using the drugs to get an "effect." One needs to keep that in mind when considering nuttmeg: the amount you use in food is not going to kill you.

(How much is? Hmm, well synthesizing the information on this page and this one, it looks like the average adult would need to eat between one and two whole seeds to get an effect. Um, IANAD, and it goes without saying that if you actually plan on getting high on nutmeg you should not base your judgements on my calculations.)

Now, as for rue....
8:24 PM, March 24, 2007
grishnash said…
I would be sure to note in particular this quote from the article you linked to at the top, "A simpleminded look at the ratio of effective to lethal doses ignores many complications, some of which are well recognized, some rather subtle."

There are many valid reasons to treat substances differently based on factors other than potential for a lethal overdose, which is what that chart shows.

I see that nicotine is not on that chart, but from other sources, it seems that the ratio of an effective dose (somewhere around 1 mg) and a lethal dose (somewhere around 40 mg) would put it somewhere around the middle of that chart. I don't know if I would categorize it as "stupid, immoral, and a waste of resources" to ban cigarettes but not alcohol from restaurants just on the basis of this, though.
10:29 PM, March 24, 2007
Zachary Drake said…
Of course, the ratio of effective to lethal dose is only one factor one should take into account when determining what kind of state control should be imposed on a substance.

In the case of cigarettes, the banning from restaurants has everything to do with the fact that they affect other people. If you want to get your nicotene via patch, that's perfectly fine. I don't care how non-toxic your drug of choice is; I think the state has a legitimate reason to restrict it if it (or its delivery mechanism) floats around in smoke and can be inhaled by other people in public places.
11:20 PM, March 24, 2007
grishnash said…
Yes, I guess that's exactly what I was trying to say.
11:28 PM, March 24, 2007
Anonymous said…
Hmm, and you know, from another way of looking at things, if something has a high effectiveness to lethality ratio, that only makes it seem more potent.
11:33 PM, March 24, 2007
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Snarking The Odyssey (with AD&D)

By -
Image
WARNING: Those of you who are accustomed to pithy political remarks here on Internal Monologue should brace yourselves for a major dose of gaming geekitude. Here's a link to one "Jamie R." who does a very snarky close reading of Homer's The Odyssey (HT: Mad Latinist via email). I've only read book 1, but it's pretty funny so far. An excerpt: Tell me, O muse, of that ingenious hero who travelled far and wide after he had sacked the famous town of Troy. Many cities did he visit, and many were the nations with whose manners and customs he was acquainted; moreover he suffered much by sea while trying to save his own life and bring his men safely home; but do what he might he could not save his men… Sooooo, he’s in charge, and everybody dies. Tell me, O muse, of that ingenious hero and his colossal failure. What? … for they perished through their own sheer folly in eating the cattle of the Sun-god Hyperion; so the god prevented them from ever rea...
Read more

Where is 56th and Wabasha? "Meet Me in the Morning" Dylan Mystery Solved

By -
Image
Short version The lyric is not "Fifty-sixth and Wabasha", it is actually "Fifty-six and Wabasha", referring to the intersection of old Minnesota Highway 56 and Wabasha Street in Saint Paul, Minnesota. If you listen, you can hear Dylan sing "fifty-six", rather than "fifty-sixth", particularly on the take that was released as the B-side to "Duquesne Whistle". Minnesota Highway 56 no longer intersects Wabasha Street, but from 1963 to 1974 it did intersect Wabasha Street, at what is now (in Feb. 2021) the intersection of George Street and Cesar Chavez Street in St. Paul, or possibly South Wabasha & Cesar Chavez.  Long Version "Meet Me in the Morning" is the first song on side two of Bob Dylan's celebrated 1975 album  Blood on the Tracks. In the opening lines of the song, according to the lyrics on Bob Dylan's official site (https://www.bobdylan.com/songs/meet-me-morning/), the narrator invites the listener to a rendez...
Read more

Victim or perpetrator? How about both!

By -
Remember in the movie Adaptation , the main character's brother has this idea for a screenplay called The Three? It's about a detective trying to track down a serial killer before he kills his next victim. Pretty standard, right? The twist is that the detective, serial killer, and victim, are all actually the same person . Whoa, dude. Fight Club 's got nothin' on that one. Well, this isn't quite that weird. But apparently, Utah legal authorities are somewhat perplexed by a situation in which a 13-year-old girl and her 12-year-old boyfriend are both simultaneously the perpetrators and victims of the same crime: having sex with each other (HT: Feministing ): Utah Supreme Court justices acknowledged Tuesday that they were struggling to wrap their minds around the concept that a 13-year-old Ogden girl could be both an offender and a victim for the same act - in this case, having consensual sex with her 12-year-old boyfriend. The girl was put in this odd position be...
Read more