Sunday, March 11, 2007

NYT calls for Gonzales' firing

Here's tomorrow's New York Times lead editorial, via mcjoan on Kos:

During the hearing on his nomination as attorney general, Alberto Gonzales said he understood the difference between the job he held — President Bush’s in-house lawyer — and the job he wanted, which was to represent all Americans as their chief law enforcement officer and a key defender of the Constitution. Two years later, it is obvious Mr. Gonzales does not have a clue about the difference.

He has never stopped being consigliere to Mr. Bush’s imperial presidency. If anyone, outside Mr. Bush’s rapidly shrinking circle of enablers, still had doubts about that, the events of last week should have erased them....

We opposed Mr. Gonzales’s nomination as attorney general. His résumé was weak, centered around producing legal briefs for Mr. Bush that assured him that the law said what he wanted it to say. More than anyone in the administration, except perhaps Vice President Dick Cheney, Mr. Gonzales symbolizes Mr. Bush’s disdain for the separation of powers, civil liberties and the rule of law.

On Thursday, Senator Arlen Specter, the senior Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, hinted very obliquely that perhaps Mr. Gonzales’s time was up. We’re not going to be oblique. Mr. Bush should dismiss Mr. Gonzales and finally appoint an attorney general who will use the job to enforce the law and defend the Constitution.

Like mcjoan, I doubt Bush will fire Gonzales. But who knows? When you're at 30% approval, how much "political capital" do you have? Congress shouldn't bother impeaching Gonzales (though that would be better than toothless hand-wringing). Impeach Bush and Cheney, and then have the new president appoint non-cronys.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Internal Monologue home