If I'm ever elected to public office...

By -
...I'm taking my oath of office on a stack of items consisting of The Communist Manifesto, Sam Harris' atheist polemic The End of Faith, and bunch of skanky porn DVD's just to piss off people like this:

An "action alert" from the American Family Association:

1. Send an email asking your U.S. Representative and Senators to pass a law making the Bible the book used in the swearing-in ceremony of Representatives and Senators.

Representative-elect Keith Ellison (D-MN) taking an oath on the Koran shouldn't even be controversial. In fact, in the official swearing in, no holy books of any kind are used at all:
Prager’s patriotic prattling is misinformed on the facts, too. No Member of Congress is officially sworn in with a Bible. Under House rules, the official swearing-in ceremony is done in the House chambers, with the Speaker of the House administering the oath of office en masse. No Bibles or other holy books are used at all. Members may, if they choose, also have a private ceremony with family and friends. At these unofficial ceremonies, Members frequently solemnize the event by taking an oath while holding a personal family Bible.
As long as there are people screaming about this kind of issue, I don't think anyone can be accused of being alarmist for using the terms "theocon" or "Christianist". It's infuriating how persecuted these people feel for not being able impose their religion in the civic sphere.

UPDATE: For an even more disdainful reaction to this whole book-choice fracas, check out Journal of Applied Misanthropology.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Um, and need I point out that the point of having a Bible there to begin with is to impress upon the swearer the seriousness of their oath? Therefore IT ONLY MAKES SENSE TO MAKE SOMEONE SWEAR ON A BOOK THAT THEY THEMSELVES HOLD SACRED?

I mean, just how compelled would the average Christian feel to keep an oath they swore on the Egyptian Book of the Dead?

(And of course, it goes without saying that anyone worthy of a high ranking government post should be mature enough to keep promises without the threat of divine retribution).
1:59 AM, December 06, 2006
Zachary Drake said…
Thanks for mentioning that. Indeed, that it is what it is there for, not to foist Christianity on the multitudes.
2:11 AM, December 06, 2006
grishnash said…
Why not use the text of the relevant paragraph of Article VI of the Constitution for this purpose? It seems to sum up the entire issue rather concisely:

"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."
10:47 AM, December 06, 2006
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Snarking The Odyssey (with AD&D)

By -
Image
WARNING: Those of you who are accustomed to pithy political remarks here on Internal Monologue should brace yourselves for a major dose of gaming geekitude. Here's a link to one "Jamie R." who does a very snarky close reading of Homer's The Odyssey (HT: Mad Latinist via email). I've only read book 1, but it's pretty funny so far. An excerpt: Tell me, O muse, of that ingenious hero who travelled far and wide after he had sacked the famous town of Troy. Many cities did he visit, and many were the nations with whose manners and customs he was acquainted; moreover he suffered much by sea while trying to save his own life and bring his men safely home; but do what he might he could not save his men… Sooooo, he’s in charge, and everybody dies. Tell me, O muse, of that ingenious hero and his colossal failure. What? … for they perished through their own sheer folly in eating the cattle of the Sun-god Hyperion; so the god prevented them from ever rea...
Read more

Where is 56th and Wabasha? "Meet Me in the Morning" Dylan Mystery Solved

By -
Image
Short version The lyric is not "Fifty-sixth and Wabasha", it is actually "Fifty-six and Wabasha", referring to the intersection of old Minnesota Highway 56 and Wabasha Street in Saint Paul, Minnesota. If you listen, you can hear Dylan sing "fifty-six", rather than "fifty-sixth", particularly on the take that was released as the B-side to "Duquesne Whistle". Minnesota Highway 56 no longer intersects Wabasha Street, but from 1963 to 1974 it did intersect Wabasha Street, at what is now (in Feb. 2021) the intersection of George Street and Cesar Chavez Street in St. Paul, or possibly South Wabasha & Cesar Chavez.  Long Version "Meet Me in the Morning" is the first song on side two of Bob Dylan's celebrated 1975 album  Blood on the Tracks. In the opening lines of the song, according to the lyrics on Bob Dylan's official site (https://www.bobdylan.com/songs/meet-me-morning/), the narrator invites the listener to a rendez...
Read more

Victim or perpetrator? How about both!

By -
Remember in the movie Adaptation , the main character's brother has this idea for a screenplay called The Three? It's about a detective trying to track down a serial killer before he kills his next victim. Pretty standard, right? The twist is that the detective, serial killer, and victim, are all actually the same person . Whoa, dude. Fight Club 's got nothin' on that one. Well, this isn't quite that weird. But apparently, Utah legal authorities are somewhat perplexed by a situation in which a 13-year-old girl and her 12-year-old boyfriend are both simultaneously the perpetrators and victims of the same crime: having sex with each other (HT: Feministing ): Utah Supreme Court justices acknowledged Tuesday that they were struggling to wrap their minds around the concept that a 13-year-old Ogden girl could be both an offender and a victim for the same act - in this case, having consensual sex with her 12-year-old boyfriend. The girl was put in this odd position be...
Read more