Short version The lyric is not "Fifty-sixth and Wabasha", it is actually "Fifty-six and Wabasha", referring to the intersection of old Minnesota Highway 56 and Wabasha Street in Saint Paul, Minnesota. If you listen, you can hear Dylan sing "fifty-six", rather than "fifty-sixth", particularly on the take that was released as the B-side to "Duquesne Whistle". Minnesota Highway 56 no longer intersects Wabasha Street, but from 1963 to 1974 it did intersect Wabasha Street, at what is now (in Feb. 2021) the intersection of George Street and Cesar Chavez Street in St. Paul, or possibly South Wabasha & Cesar Chavez. Long Version "Meet Me in the Morning" is the first song on side two of Bob Dylan's celebrated 1975 album Blood on the Tracks. In the opening lines of the song, according to the lyrics on Bob Dylan's official site (https://www.bobdylan.com/songs/meet-me-morning/), the narrator invites the listener to a rendez
Comments
No single aspect of the liberal character defines it as much as the truncated perspective. (Cathy Davidson)
"There's nothing wrong with modern day Republicans pandering to racist voters, because 150 years ago, southern Democrats were pro-slavery."
- Thus sayeth the Philospher King known as -ben
Or do we get to make one up for you?
Oh, you mean like how you made John "Flip-flop" Kerry sound all so much more intellectual than Bush, but it turned out that Kerry actually had a lower GPA than Bush in college?
Isn't that what you do? Or, do you feign reading miscomprehension when the truth hits you. My point? Why the omission of the Democratic Party's links to slavery?
As for pandering to racist voters, you might want to check out the Democrats' alliance with Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Speaking of which... hey, when are they apologizing to the 3 Duke lacrosse players?
The point? The point is hypocrisy. Pure and simple.
I would ask you to run (from the truth) but, at your age, you might drop dead from a cardiac infarction, so just shut down your computer. That way, you can earn enough carbon credits to visit Al "In 1 month I use what an average American household uses in electricity a year" Gore's mansion someday.
Take your soft-bigotry and shove it. I've seen plenty of your kind.
I think Ben's bringing up Dem support for Slavery in the Civil War era is absurd. It goes without saying that the parties have metamorphosed almost beyond recognition since then.
I think the quote -ben uses at the end of his first comment
If Democrats quote racists or use other forms of signalling that bigotry is OK, they should be called on it. I admit I am not as vigilant in my policing of Dems, but I figure the Republicans and folks like -ben have that job well covered.
For example, I think Sharpton's recent comment saying that Romney doesn't really believe in God was absurd. Mormons believe in God, and to imply that they don't is ridiculous. Of course, I'm also annoyed that not believing in God was implicitly assumed to be a bad thing.
I am aware that Kerry's GPA at Yale was lower than Bushes. But that doesn't mean Kerry isn't more intellectual. There's a lot more to grades than whether someone is intellectual or not.
My beef with Bush has never been about lack of raw intelligence. It is that he is profoundly incurious about the world, and seems completely convinced of his own correctness regardless of the evidence. As a result, his actions end up being stupid, even though I don't think he's particularly dumb.
As to the rest of -ben's namecalling, I don't think it's that productive. Although I admit I've engaged in simlar insult hurling, I hope I have directed my venom at more specific policies and outrages rather than just hurling it scattershot at a bunch of unrelated items. Brining up Al Gore's energy consumption, Sharpton's racism, Dem support of slavery in the Civil War era, and Kerry's GPA in one thread just seems silly.
-Ben,
I think the quote -ben uses at the end of his first comment kinda starts the name calling. I think after quoting that, his cry of "attacking the messenger" rings rather hollow. (And I disagree that liberalism is characterized by truncated perspective. I don't think conservatism are characterized by it either.)
-ben, conservatives are welcome here, but please try to stay on topic. If you think it's hypocritical for me to say "not cool" when a Republican quotes a KKK founder on the House floor, you are free to bring to my attention recent statements made by Democrats made on the House floor that you think are equivalently "not cool". But bringing up 19th century stances that are completely irrelevant to today's political landscape is not going to win you many converts here.
The only thing I would like to see here is such photo or even two :)
Sexy Lady
Female Escorts London