In which I write down all those musings of which the world has been horribly deprived until this moment.
(Progressive Politics, Liberal Religion, Sex, and the occasional abnormality that bubbles forth from goodness knows where.)
It somehow makes sense, though, that if you continue to insulate yourself from facts and reality that don't agree with your personal preferences that it dulls your ability to detect sarcasm and satire. Hence the glowing praise of late by Bushies for Colbert and now the War Nerd.
I think War Nerd is doing a great service, however, and I'd certainly like to see him in charge of our military policy versus the current crew. The idea that we could have a nice, clean, brief counter-insurgency war just for the hell of it, and it would be a benefit to our country is just so beyond ridiculous. It's like going into a pet store and asking to see the indoor rhinocerous that will best match the decor of your studio apartment. I can't help but think that had someone been thinking of the historical record beforehand, the invasion plan would never have survived cost-benefit analysis. And a lot fewer people would have been cowed into supporting it had the proponents been upfront from the beginning with the reality that we would eventually be resorting to retaliatory civilian massacres just to attempt to hold our ground.
Plus, he used the analogy of the sampan scene, which I've been saying for about 3 years now.
GenCon Indy approaches, and so I'm not posting much. I hear D&D co-creator Gary Gygax will be at the convention this year. If I run into him, I want him to autograph one of the most ridiculous pieces of gaming weirdness ever to make it into a mainstream AD&D publication. I'm speaking, of course, about the infamous random prostitute generation table in the 1st Edition Dungeon Master's Guide . That book included a random encounter table for cities; "Harlot" is one of the entries. Here is the Harlot entry, reproduced in facsimile for your delectation: Sadly, subsequent editions of the Dungeon Master's Guide lack such useful prompts to the imagination. Dungeon Masters are now forced to improvise descriptions of harlots, should such be encountered by an adventuring party. Unless, of course, the Dungeon Master owns a copy of the 1st Edition DMG or is lucky enough to see this blog post. In the interest of fairness and gender equality, this table should
I'm embarrassed to say that I only recently learned what "Rickrolling" is (yeah, -20 geek points for me). " Rickrolling " is an Internet prank that's been going on for the past couple years. The prank involves posting a link which seems to be to something of great interest, but is in fact a link to the video for Rick Astley's 1987 hit "Never Gonna Give You Up" . It's quite a popular prank: that video in the previous link has over 23 million views as of this post. ADVERTISEMENT Click HERE to get an iPhone 3GS and one year data plan free!
Short version The lyric is not "Fifty-sixth and Wabasha", it is actually "Fifty-six and Wabasha", referring to the intersection of old Minnesota Highway 56 and Wabasha Street in Saint Paul, Minnesota. If you listen, you can hear Dylan sing "fifty-six", rather than "fifty-sixth", particularly on the take that was released as the B-side to "Duquesne Whistle". Minnesota Highway 56 no longer intersects Wabasha Street, but from 1963 to 1974 it did intersect Wabasha Street, at what is now (in Feb. 2021) the intersection of George Street and Cesar Chavez Street in St. Paul, or possibly South Wabasha & Cesar Chavez. Long Version "Meet Me in the Morning" is the first song on side two of Bob Dylan's celebrated 1975 album Blood on the Tracks. In the opening lines of the song, according to the lyrics on Bob Dylan's official site (https://www.bobdylan.com/songs/meet-me-morning/), the narrator invites the listener to a rendez
Comments
I think War Nerd is doing a great service, however, and I'd certainly like to see him in charge of our military policy versus the current crew. The idea that we could have a nice, clean, brief counter-insurgency war just for the hell of it, and it would be a benefit to our country is just so beyond ridiculous. It's like going into a pet store and asking to see the indoor rhinocerous that will best match the decor of your studio apartment. I can't help but think that had someone been thinking of the historical record beforehand, the invasion plan would never have survived cost-benefit analysis. And a lot fewer people would have been cowed into supporting it had the proponents been upfront from the beginning with the reality that we would eventually be resorting to retaliatory civilian massacres just to attempt to hold our ground.
Plus, he used the analogy of the sampan scene, which I've been saying for about 3 years now.